By Joel South
Publication Date: 2026-05-10 13:00:00
© wellesenterprises / iStock Editorial via Getty Images
On the We Study Billionaires podcast (episode TIP813), Stig Brodersen laid out a bear case that puts Microsoft’s Office cash cow squarely in the crosshairs of generative AI. His framing matters because it targets the one franchise inside Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT | MSFT Price Prediction) that has resisted every prior assault: the per-seat productivity suite that Google could never crack.
The Per-Seat Problem
Brodersen’s core observation is about labor intensity, not feature parity. “When someone uses an LLM to generate a first draft in let’s say 30 seconds, and then spends 20 minutes editing rather than two hours actually creating that first draft, they fundamentally changed the human labor intensity of that task,” he said.
The implication is structural: Microsoft’s per-seat subscription model assumes “one license for each human doing cognitive work,” and if AI absorbs a meaningful share of that work,…
