A petitioner’s attorney quoted “rulings that never existed, strongly suggesting that the petitioner’s representative used artificial intelligence” in a case, Justice Gila Kanfi-Steinitz of the Supreme Court said in her ruling on Sunday night.
The case involved a petition filed against a decision by the Sharia Court, which deals with family law according to Muslim law.
While the rulings are confidential, Justice Kanfi-Steinitz wanted to address the phenomenon of lawyers using…
Article Source
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-843442
