In recent news, a journalist admitted to making an error in reporting on the different versions of IBM’s Db2 database. While discussing the versions for Linux, Unix, Windows, and System Z mainframe, they forgot to include the version for the midrange server, previously known as the AS/400 and now called the iSeries or IBM i. Despite the embarrassment of the mistake, the journalist has been persistent in trying to get IBM to discuss Db2, with no success.
Db2, based on IBM researcher Edgar Frank “Ted” Codd’s relational database theory from 1970, has been a reliable option since its inception. Initially available on mainframes, it later expanded to Unix, Linux, and Windows. Known for its adoption of SQL, Db2 has been a popular choice for large, reliable applications, with banks making up a significant portion of its user base. While some may view it as outdated, experts argue that it remains well-designed and reliable compared to its commercial rival, Oracle.
Despite its strengths, IBM has been relatively quiet about Db2, releasing new features sporadically. Recent developments include an AI-powered query optimizer for Db2 LUW v12 and its availability as an AWS RDS. However, these announcements have come from external sources rather than IBM itself. With the tech industry’s focus on growth and hypergrowth, it’s unclear why IBM isn’t more vocal about Db2’s future. In an era where the cloud is a dominant trend, IBM’s silence on its cloud strategy for Db2 is puzzling.
Compared to new entrants like Snowflake, Db2 may not exhibit the same hypergrowth potential. However, it holds a strong position in the market and ranks high in industry rankings. In comparison to PostgreSQL, another long-established relational database, Db2’s lack of innovation and storytelling may be hindering its ability to compete and adapt to changing trends. As PostgreSQL gains popularity as an interface for other services, IBM may need to reconsider its approach to promoting Db2 and engaging with the tech community.
In conclusion, Db2 remains a reliable and well-established database, but IBM’s reluctance to share its future plans and promote it effectively may impact its ability to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving tech landscape. As industry trends and customer expectations shift towards growth and innovation, IBM may need to rethink its strategy for Db2 to ensure its continued relevance in the market.
Article Source
https://www.theregister.com/AMP/2024/07/04/db2_a_story_worth_telling/
