Epic v. Google: Key insights from the ongoing Fortnite court case

During a recent court hearing regarding the ongoing legal battle between Epic Games and Google, Epic’s lead attorney, Gary Bornstein, interrupted Google’s attorney as he attempted to address the issue of chat. The judge allowed Google’s attorney to continue but advised him to proceed with caution.

Kravis, representing Google, highlighted how Epic had allegedly overreached during the trial by failing to provide evidence that certain actions, such as Project Hug, were direct bribes or that Samsung was collaborating with Google. Despite the judge’s warning, Epic pushed forward by claiming that they were only seeking a free ride on Google Play. Kravis argued that Epic cannot keep profits from their own store and then claim they are trying to protect consumers.

In essence, the discussion in the courtroom centered around Epic’s alleged overreach in attempting to prove their case against Google. Google’s attorney was reminded to be cautious in his approach by the judge. Epic’s argument that they are trying to protect consumers while seeking a benefit on Google Play was challenged by Google’s legal team. It seems that the battle between these two tech giants continues to be intense and complex.

Article Source
https://www.theverge.com/23945184/epic-v-google-fortnite-play-store-antitrust-trial-updates