LONDON – Those who have tried to end a membership on Amazon Prime, the tech giant’s digital subscription service, may be familiar with the multi-click process: warnings that canceling will result in the loss of “exclusive benefits” and prompts to reverse course or to switch to an annual membership instead.
Consumer rights groups in Europe and the United States are now calling on regulators to take action against Amazon over this prime design feature.
A Norwegian consumer rights group on Thursday filed a legal complaint The regulators of this country accuse Amazon of engaging in unfair business practices with the Prime cancellation design. This is the latest step in a broader drive to make technology companies more accountable to users.
“It should be as easy to end a subscription as it ever was,” said Finn Lützow-Holm Myrstad, director of digital policy at the rights group, the Norwegian Consumer Council. “This practice not only betrays consumer expectations and confidence, it also violates European law.”
The move was welcomed on Thursday by advocates of consumer rights in Europe, some of whom said they filed their own complaints, and in the United States.
Ekpizo, a consumer organization in Greece that filed complaints with regulators after hearing consumers, said the design of the Prime cancellation process was “a deliberate effort by Amazon to confuse and mislead its customers”.
In France, UFC-Que Choisir, the country’s largest consumer protection group, spoke out support for the Norwegian complaint. One of the largest German consumer protection groups, VSBV, agreed to join the campaign against Amazon, but was still checking whether German customers were facing similar hurdles.
In the United States, Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer group, said it wrote to the Federal Trade Commission asking them to investigate whether the cancellation policy was in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
“Amazon should treat customers with respect instead of trying to undermine their autonomy and combat their choices,” said Burcu Kilic, director of the group’s digital rights program.
Amazon denied claims that the cancellation process created uncertainty.
“We’re making it easy for customers to go whenever they want,” the company said in a statement Thursday, adding that there are several ways to cancel online or by phone. Information provided during the cancellation process gives a full overview of the benefits and Terminate service members, “said the company.
Consumer rights advocates said the technology used by Amazon is the “Dark Pattern” Used on websites and apps to encourage people to do things they wouldn’t otherwise. Tech companies like Amazon would have a huge impact on consumers.
Techniques can include pinning travel insurance on flights, encouraging people to accept a legal agreement, or signing up for marketing emails, said Harry Brignull, an expert on misleading online practices who coined the term “obscure” in 2010 Pattern “can be easily made available to all users,” he said.
A recent survey of 1,000 people by the Norwegian Consumer Council found that one in four reported difficulties unsubscribing from digital content services.
The techniques used to keep users signed in to Amazon Prime included complicated navigation boxes and skewed language that viewed membership cancellation as a negative, said Myrstad, of the Norwegian consumer group. “They are used to evoke emotions in you. People are afraid of losing something. They play with your fears. “
Although he described the tactics as manipulative, Mr Brignull said it was unclear whether they were illegal. The new California Privacy Rights Actspecifies, for example, that “an agreement reached through the use of dark patterns does not constitute consent” but it is unclear how this could be applied.
Consumer group efforts come from tech companies like Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Apple grappling with a barrage of criticism and lawsuits.
In the United States, the Department of Justice has accused Google illegal protection of his monopoly over the search, while federal and state regulators have sued Facebook for buying its rival Dominate social media. In Europe, legislators and regulators develop regulations aimed to limit the power of the four companies.
Over a dozen consumer rights groups in Europe and the US have worked together to raise concerns about large tech companies with regulators, said Ursula Pachl, deputy director general of the European Consumer Organization, an umbrella organization that represents groups in 32 countries.
“Europe has very good consumer protection law but it needs to be enforced,” said Ms Pachl, adding that her organization intends to send a letter to the European Commission raising the groups’ concerns. “What we need now is that the authorities use the tools they have in place to apply them to the online market.”
The effort will build on an earlier campaign run by seven European consumer organizations in 2018 that said Google manipulated users to get location tracking information.
Outside of consumer promotions, disgruntled consumers had another avenue available to them in everyday life – they complained loudly, Brignull said.
“My message to consumers would be to publicly complain about these things,” he said, adding that regulators have been paying attention to feedback on social media and business review websites. “It gives them a massive signal.”
The reporting was contributed by Niki Kitsantonis from Athens, Christopher Schuetze from Berlin and Aurelien Breeden from Paris.